![]() ![]() Therefore, being able to assess to what extent these requirements are accomplished is an obligation in order to guarantee the quality of the final annotation outcomes. Some examples of semantic annotation activities are the annotation of digital educational resources (e.g., learning objects) in the eLearning domain (Aroyo & Dicheva, 2004 Devedzic, Jovanovic, & Gasevic, 2007 Kurilovas, Kubilinskiene, & Dagiene, 2014 Tiropanis, Davis, Millard, & Weal, 2009), the annotation of media content in the multimedia domain (Hunter & Gerber, 2010 Labra, Ordónez, & Cueva-Lovelle, 2010 Mu, 2010 Šimko, Tvarožek, & Bieliková, 2013), or the one chosen as a case study in this paper: the annotation of digitized literary texts (Azouaou & Desmoulins, 2006 Donato et al., 2013 Gayoso, Sanz, & Sierra, 2013 Gayoso et al., 2012 Koivunen, 2005 Rocha, Willrich, Fileto, & Tazi, 2009 Schroeter, Hunter, Guerin, Khan, & Henderson, 2006 Tazi, Al-tawki, & Drira, 2003 The main objective of any semantic annotation activity should be to produce an annotation of the resources in the underlying digital collection that satisfies all the requirements of accuracy, completeness and adequacy posed by the intended uses of the collection. The resulting activities are referred to as semantic annotation activities in this paper. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |